By TONY REED Staff Writer -
Updated: 06/25/2009 07:58:13 AM PDT
Ft. Bragg Advocate-News
At its regular meeting June 22, the City Council unanimously opposed a massive “mixed use specific plan” for Ukiah’s former Masonite plant.
The resolution follows a similar June 3 resolution by the Ukiah City Council, which unanimously opposed the plan.
A plan submitted by Mendocino Crossings proposes to build 650,000 square feet of commercial space and 150,000 square feet of residential space on the 74-acre property northeast of Ukiah. Developers Diversified Realty Inc. (DDR) owns the land and is one of the country’s largest retail developers.
According to the resolution, city staff members reviewed the plan and believe it would have a negative impact on the City of Ukiah, as well as the rest of the county. The resolution was later amended to say the Fort Bragg City Council reviewed it.
The site is designated as industrial, zoned as I-1 (Limited Industrial) and I-2 (General Industrial) for industrial use under the county’s general plan.
Despite its name, the 310-page plan is less than specific and many pages contain a boxed disclaimer saying, “The location and types of land uses, roadways, and buildings illustrated above are conceptual and subject to change.”
A possible loophole
During the meeting, speakers and council members repeatedly said the initiative is an attempt by the property owner to avoid public hearings, county zoning requirements and an environmental impact report.
Page B-228, Chapter 8.5 of the plan starts, “Pursuant to Section 15378 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “the submittal of proposals to a vote of the people of the state or of a particular community that does not involve a public agency sponsored initiative is not defined as a “project.” Consequently, this Specific Plan is not classified as a project’ by State law and is exempt from the CEQA process.” However, the plan does say impacts will be mitigated whenever possible.
According to a ballot initiative study prepared for the Board of Supervisors under the direction of the County Administration Office, the proposed initiative would modify the existing land use designation of the site from Industrial to “Mixed-Use Specific Plan.” The plan designation will allow for development of up to 800,000 square feet of building area, 150 residential units and a variety of uses including light industrial, retail, commercial, residential, office, hotel, entertainment, educational, public facilities, utility installations, parking lots and structures, and open space.
“In the case of using the ballot box initiative process to create land use changes, the standard planning process would not be required and the results of the vote of the general electorate would determine if the project could be developed,” the study reads. “Procedural requirements (i.e. notice, hearing and findings) necessary for adoption of a specific plan, adoption of a general plan or amendment of the zoning code do not apply if the same measure is adopted by initiative so there is no public input except by the yes or no ballot vote. There would be no required mitigation other than that identified within the text of the initiative.”
The plan also mentions the Fort Bragg mill site as one of a few “vacant industrial areas available for use.”
The council’s resolution concluded that such development would have negative impacts on water, fire and police services, traffic safety and aesthetics.
“We urge all citizens to study the Mendocino Crossings Mixed Use plan and to become informed about the potential size, magnitude and intensity of its build-out and the implications of rezoning the Masonite site,” the resolution reads.
“The Mendocino County Tomorrow ballot initiative eliminates the public hearing process which is an important opportunity for citizens and their elected representatives to engage in a deliberative dialog about the pros and cons of the project,” said the council resolution.
From the council
Council member Dan Gjerde and Mayor Doug Hammerstrom brought the resolution to the meeting. They said the ballot initiative would give DDR special considerations not afforded to any other county developers. Gjerde explained that the initiative, if passed, would allow DDR to rezone a section of property and be exempt from California Environmental Quality Act requirements. He said the property owner would not be required to mitigate the impacts on neighbors, the City of Ukiah or others.
In a statement that would be repeated several times Monday evening, Gjerde said, “I felt this was basically a bad idea.”
Gjerde said the proposed development would be 13 times bigger than Fort Bragg’s Safeway supermarket.
He said the additional retail space would devastate Ukiah’s commercial sector, complicate traffic and undercut the efforts of county supervisors who require every developer to follow the same rules. He said the size and scope could also change, based on the property owner’s discretion. The plan proposes five extra stoplights be installed on State Street to handle traffic.
Hammerstrom had similar concerns, saying the wealthy developers opted for a ballot initiative in order to avoid the lengthy regular processes. He said later that a ballot measure will supersede laws that typically provide protection for all residents.
“I don’t think any of our citizens would say they want a decision made just with a ballot measure,” he said.
City Council member and Local Agency Formation Commission Chairman Jere Melo said LAFCO’s job is to ensure that services can be provided to a proposed project. He said the area’s water district has a waiting list of over 300 people wanting to hook up to the water supply there. He said the project would stretch fire and sanitation district resources.
Melo referred to a letter written by attorney Marguerite Mary Leoni, which said LAFCO improperly used public funds to campaign against the project. The letter refers to a service impact report written by LAFCO CEO Frank McMichael.
Leoni’s letter demanded that the LAFCO board declare that the service impact report was not approved by LAFCO, was not based on factual information, and that McMichael does not have the knowledge to make claims about potential water impacts. Melo said the board reviewed the letter and did none of those things.
Other input
Ukiah City Council member Benj Thomas called Leoni’s letter “an attempt to muzzle McMichael.”
Thomas was direct in his description of what the plan would mean to county residents.
“It means an end to regional planning … it’s a violation of all the procedures that we have invested in county planning because it bypasses those. It bypasses the state regulations regarding CEQA and, as Dan said, it’s a bad idea,” Thomas said. “It’s the substitution of a propaganda-driven political campaign for thorough and valuable planning processes.”
Thomas said that if the countywide initiative succeeds, it would likely be the first of many to come.
“We are all vulnerable to this kind of attack,” he said. “I think it’s risky. I worry that an issue this complex should not be decided by people who have not been exposed to the full complexities of the issue.”
Guinness McFadden, a Potter Valley farmer and SOLE (Save Our Local Economy) spokesman, called the 310-page DDR plan “illusionary vision.” He said page 42 of the plan contains a disclaimer that its contents are conceptual. He said the ballot requires that the county General Plan be changed if it conflicts with the DDR plan.
“None of us like planning. We’d all just like to do what we want to do,” he said. “Why should these people be allowed to do what they want to do when everyone else in the county has to get a permit to build a doghouse? It’s just not fair.”
McFadden said the project would also cause severe traffic impacts.
“If you like the traffic in Santa Rosa, you won’t have to drive as far to get it,” he said. “You’ll get it in Ukiah.”
Miles Everett, chair of the Fort Bragg council’s Economic Development Action Committee, said the issue will continue and that the council and voters need to keep informed. He said the Democratic Party of Mendocino County will continue to fight the initiative, and asked council members and voters to participate.
Jeff Tyrrell, representing the Mendocino Coast Democratic Club, said he opposes any initiative designed to circumvent the environmental impact report process.
Fort Bragg resident George Reinhardt noted that Ukiah area people had come “over the hill” to speak to the council on the issue.
“I hope we don’t have to go over the hill to speak to people in Willits and Ukiah when some madcap, ill-advised corporate vision is trying to be imposed on our community for this former [G-P] mill site that we all are talking about and have great hopes for,” he said.
Vice-Mayor Dave Turner said the council needs to be firm in opposing the initiative, because of its precedent-setting potential.
“If you want to know that you are satisfied with this, you need to read and understand every bit of the ballot measure,” he said.
Hammerstrom’s statement inspired McFadden to drop the 310-page document on the table in front of the council. He said a vote against the initiative means you support your locally elected officials, rather than attorneys representing corporations with special interests.
“I find this whole thing offensive and frightening,” said Council member Meg Courtney, who recalled being “accosted” by a hired petition signature-gatherer at Safeway. “From the beginning, it’s been a nightmare.”
Council members opposed the initiative unanimously, prompting applause in the room.
The county Board of Supervisors approved the ballot measure to place the initiative in the November ballot.


